Nov 4

Like with most legal jargon, “employment at will” has both a formal definition and a practical one. In this case, the theory is easy. The basic definition of “employment at will” says the employer or the employee may end the working relationship at any time and for any reason without fearing legal action. This means the employer can fire or lay off the employee whenever they want. According to the theory, the employers do not have to explain why they fired their worker.

This definition also claims the employee may choose to quit his or her job at any time. Under such circumstances, the worker does not have to give the employer the reason for leaving his or her current position.

Read the rest of this entry »

del.icio.us:Employment At Will digg:Employment At Will spurl:Employment At Will reddit:Employment At Will fark:Employment At Will
Nov 4

Wrongful termination is actionable and the various remedies available are complex. This form of employment termination is also referred to as wrongful dismissal or wrongful discharge.

When your intuition is telling you that you are about to be fired, stall. Stall long enough to contact an attorney. Or, if you already have been fired, contact a lawyer immediately.

Read the rest of this entry »

del.icio.us:Attaining a lawyer for Wrongful Termination digg:Attaining a lawyer for Wrongful Termination spurl:Attaining a lawyer for Wrongful Termination reddit:Attaining a lawyer for Wrongful Termination fark:Attaining a lawyer for Wrongful Termination
Nov 3

Wrongful dismissal, also called wrongful termination or wrongful discharge, is an idiom and legal phrase, describing a situation in which an employee’s contract of employment has been terminated by the employer in circumstances where the termination breaches one or more terms of the contract of employment, or a statute provision in employment law. It follows that the scope for wrongful dismissal varies according to the terms of the employment contract, and varies by jurisdiction. Note that the absence of a formal contract of employment does not preclude wrongful dismissal in jurisdictions in which a de facto contract is taken to exist by virtue of the employment relationship. Terms of such a contract may include obligations and rights outlined in an employee handbook.

Read the rest of this entry »

del.icio.us:What is needed to prove wrongful termination? digg:What is needed to prove wrongful termination? spurl:What is needed to prove wrongful termination? reddit:What is needed to prove wrongful termination? fark:What is needed to prove wrongful termination?